The European Journal of International Law Vol. 18 no. 3 © EJIL 2007; all rights reserved
International Responses to Iranian Nuclear Defiance: The Non-Aligned Movement and the Issue of Non-Compliance
* Director of the Diplomacy Programme, School of Political Science and Communication, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Email: tanya.ogilvie-white{at}canterbury.ac.nz.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
This article explores the responses of the non-nuclear-weapon states (NNWS) to Iran's violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), focusing on the stance adopted by members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In February 2006, key NAM members voted to refer Iran to the UN Security Council in a move that stunned Iranian diplomats, and seemed to signal a collapse in NAM solidarity on fundamental non-proliferation issues. This article assesses the significance of this event, analysing the extent to which it represents a softening in the ideological divide between NAM and Western approaches to third-party non-compliance, and a convergence in attitudes towards the nuclear non-proliferation regime more generally. It draws on the interlinking concepts of international system, international society and global society to help explain these developments, exploring the hurdles and opportunities associated with any attempt to build on the fragile consensus emerging among the NNWS over the need to respond more decisively to NPT violations.